Censorship topic (out of the news thread)


  • Banned

    @sheria But you aren't.
    I've offered an opinion, and instead of offering any kind of rebuttal or counter point, you're kinda just throwing a tantrum and acting very juvenile.

    So like my homie Dipset asked, what is your take?



  • @el-shmiablo said in Censorship topic (out of the news thread):

    @sheria But you aren't.
    I've offered an opinion, and instead of offering any kind of conjecture or counter point, you're kinda just throwing a tantrum and acting very juvenile.

    So like my homie Dipset asked, what is your take?

    Your "opinion" on the subject is as much of a Parrott as anything I've seen here, just another echo of someone here that you agreed with.

    My take has been said before, nothing new has been bought to the table, in fact it's got to be the worst example of rehashing a thread that I've seen.

    Please don't use the term juvenile though, not when you're comments I've followed over the last decade have shown you as you are.



  • @sheria it is hard to say you are not coming off as juvenile with your comments, it's fine if you don't wanna give your take, but don't expect others to take what you are saying seriously if this all you are going to say.



  • @sheria I find it kind of absurd that you are getting defensive when you started the whole thing. As Shmiablo said, you offered no take at all. Your only contribution was to name call. If you want to talk, please talk, but don't continue to jab at someone for seemingly no reason. It comes off as bitter and -- as others have said -- juvenile.


  • Global Moderator

    @Sheria Take it down a notch. You might not agree with the people, but the way you are engaging in the discussing is by name calling and trying to trigger others. I dont say you have to agree with them, but approach it in a more mature way than calling it all juvenile etc.


  • Banned

    Ugh.

    0_1551908824410_1551905555142.png

    Dang Valve, telling me what I can and can't play.



  • I bet you that developer will make a lot more money because of this controversy.



  • @iboshow
    Probably, at least more then they would of made had it released on Steam, will probably find it's way to Nutaku or something in a few days



  • From what I've heard about this whole thing it just reads to me like Hatred: Sexual Content Edition. Banking on the streisand effect to do the marketing for them, and whenever it shows up on some other platform it'll probably do just fine.



  • It's crazy that they're using such careful language to justify their decision: "unknown costs and risks", "We respect developers' desires to express themselves", "difficult for us to help them"...

    Can't you just say "This game is horrible and shouldn't exist and we refuse to be associated with it or whoever made it"?

    Because really, fuck this game and whoever made it...



  • Yeah I don't get why Steam is being so vague about their reasoning. Just say "this game is shit and we don't want it," and I'm sure 99% of people will be ok with it. I'm sure it has to do with not wanting to violate their new hands-off policy, but a game that encourages sexual assault is much different than some horny guy's visual novel.



  • Damn! I better get a refund!


  • Banned

    @capnbobamous Because then all of the shitty manchildren who make up a significant amount of "gamers" that don't understand what free speech means will have a complete mental break and take out all their misplaced sexual frustration on Valve.



  • @el-shmiablo I say let them cry. Steam will not be hurt in the slightest by their complaining, and it serves as entertainment for the rest of us.



  • @lotias said in Censorship topic (out of the news thread):

    @Sheria Take it down a notch. You might not agree with the people, but the way you are engaging in the discussing is by name calling and trying to trigger others. I dont say you have to agree with them, but approach it in a more mature way than calling it all juvenile etc.

    It's ok, I clearly don't need to post anymore as the comments in the thread are amusing enough on their own even without rebuttal. Maybe one day though some might actually see that there's already enough name calling and attempts to trigger going on here and stop being so one sided :)





  • A female bum in an 18+ game, clearly a cause for concern.



  • @sheria
    It clear is, based on the response to its removal.



  • @sacred-arfaid said in Censorship topic (out of the news thread):

    @sheria
    It clear is, based on the response to its removal.

    I find the discussion on making such a change is something very different, but that's me. I don't think the minor details on what exactly has been "lost" in this individual case is really their concern.


  • Banned

    Sony Computer Entertainment got so pretentious after moving their headquarters to Cali. I miss the good old days, when they didn't bat an eye at sex (God of War).