@alexwhiteplays That is an excellent point. I agree. Would you think the Jolly Award needs to go as well?
Posts made by Chaseman12
RE: 2017 Easy Allies Best Moments of the Year
@Lotias The idea is to have the awards be just from 2017.
Also, if we write down big moments either in this thread or another, that would make it easier to remember.
I know the guys are busy but once they have the nominees, if there was a nominees video for each award, that might make it more balanced.
2017 Easy Allies Best Moments of the Year
In the last Podcast, Huber laid down the Prove It Ticket with authority and it was awesome. I invite you to check it out if you haven't. Many people said it was the best use of the Prove It Ticket so far.
This got me to thinking...what would you all think about voting in December for the Best Moments of the Year. The community could collect votes on a few awards and the guys could read the results on the last Group Stream of the year.
I think the best way to do it is to have the Power 9 (do we have an official name for the 9 Allies we watch? Just saying Allies makes me think them plus the community) come up with categories, the community posts moments they think should be nominated either here or somewhere else, the guys pick the final nominees at the beginning of December, and finally the community votes.
Some ideas I had for categories are:
Best Stream (for a stream that appears regularly like Bosman v Wozniak or Talking Syndrome)
Best Individual Stream (for a single stream)
Best Podcast Moment
Best Tabletop Escapade Moment
Best Use of the Prove It Ticket
Best Group Stream Moment
Best E3 Coverage Moment
Jolly Award (Best Moment Overall)
Best in Show (Best EZA Show ex. Easy Update, Huber Syndrome, Frame Trap, etc.)
These are just suggestions. Feel free to add your own. Also, if you like or dislike the idea just take a moment to say why. I hope this creates discussion and we have a great awards show at the end of the year that we can all feel a part of.
Love & Respect.
E3 Bets and Double Down on Don?
Before I begin, I know the bets show was for fun and the whole thing is not super serious. Also, full disclosure, I was for Kyle all the way.
If you watched the Group Stream on Tuesday you saw that Huber won E3 bets. It is safe to say that this was due to Don's bets during the Double Down on Don segment of the E3 Bets special. Had those points gone any other way, Bosman would have won.
My question is this, how were those points decided? I went back and rewatched the E3 Bets special. I paid special attention to the Double Down on Don segment. Kyle was very clear that Don was on both of their teams. At no point do Kyle or Michael say this question is for me or I get these points if he is wrong. I took that to mean that both teams got the points if Don was correct and neither team got any if he was wrong.
During the E3 streams, another viewer (his name escapes me now) made a chart listing all of the bets and how each team performed. He listed both teams as getting 3 points from Double Down on Don because Don was correct on one bet and not correct on the other. It was very well put together and I just wanted to give him a shoutout. I bring it up to illustrate that I was not the only one to interpret the bets in this way.
Can someone help me out?
TL:DR How were the points from Don's bets assigned and when did they say that is how it was done?
Love and Respect,