Basically sounds like what I expected from this one, except maybe the zombie hordes are more stable than expected, which maybe was where all that extra time went to making sure it worked well. Just sounds like the whole game around it also needed that extra polish and didn't get it, but I can respect the devs if they had to make a difficult choice for what area of the game to touch up and stuck to trying to deliver the promise of what made the game originally interesting.

@sheria Already gone way into it extensively above, but I just don't see how people could call it unfair when it is the most open of all those games when it comes to information and forgiving mistakes.

For Playstation 4 and Nintendo Switch:
Youtube Video

https://www.pscp.tv/w/1BdxYAprjYBxX Day 2 Concert, expected S Info to drop at the end just as Royal did yesterday.

Posting here, because I know some people wanted every Spirit, and they're introducing limited time ones now. I hate limited time crap.

@el-shmiablo They can get away with it, so they'll keep doing it. Least Royal looks beefy enough to semijustify it.

@el-shmiablo Everyone does, but that's not how Atlus rolls. Expect to be forced to pay full price all over again and rebuy all your DLC outfits. If you're lucky you'll get some bonus for owning the original in Royal or the option to transfer save data over but probably not.

@el-shmiablo Regular and Collector's Edition, can't read moon either, but saw an article that mentioned it

@el-shmiablo I hear all you're saying, but it really is no different than saying excess violence in media leads to people acting more violently and increased murder rates. In a vacuum, that'd probably be true, but we live in a society where things like parents / other role models and societal decency laws exist to educate and influence these kinds of outcomes. Some people may still choose to ignore those things and behave as they will, but it then falls upon them to deal with the repercussions of such. It is very hypocritical to be okay with violent media existing and only shun the sexual media. You can say both are bad for people, and you might be right, least when not accounting for things like self discovery and declining birth rates in some countries which some fear will someday undo our species, (although right now there's an excess of people) but I tend to never see people trying to end violent AND sexual media. Usually instead they're slanted toward finding one normal and the other abnormal due to the society and groups they were raised around, and it instead becomes a game of wanting less of what makes them uncomfortable and more of the one they've become used to through repeated exposure.

Also, as for this study you cite, I don't think it is any secret that humans were wired to find younger women more attractive than older ones. If you went to the grocery store, you'd probably want a fresh banana over one that's closer to spoiling. Biologically we'd look for mates who still are capable of providing many children over ones approaching no longer being able to do so, and that's almost ironically wired into us even in the current day when many people don't even want children and look for a much wider spectrum of traits in their partner. Heck, if we didn't have laws to protect younger people until they have more time to mentally grow and prepare to make big life decisions like having kids, biology would dictate going after even younger mates as people sexually mature way before they turn 18 or whatever the magic age your local society has decided is okay for its residents to delve into sexual matters. So people calling teen girls attractive in movies I'd argue is simply hard-coded human nature, but the fact that exceptions and such exist today and grow increasingly common shows the changes in how we live now are slowly curving us towards older partners that make more sense for our extended lifespans and varied wants in a partner.

Although I do think there should be some sense of responsibility from the people making the movies to make sure older people aren't the ones labeling them as such unless the movie specifically makes it known this is bad, since that is not acceptable behavior in the cultures we live in and sends the wrong messages much like men sexually harassing women in television and movies in the 90s and earlier being treated as a joke and acceptable was awful and led to those behaviors. Those are the things that need to stamped out, not dictating to people how they're allowed to dress, despite what makes them feel comfortable and others less so. You wouldn't tell a man he's not allowed to wear traditionally labeled female clothing while trying to stamp out media in which this is displayed today, and this is no different. At the end of the day, it is up to the individual, but the harassing behavior to people dressing as they choose is what there's absolutely no place for. In trying to curb harassing behaviors, you don't want to damage sexual independence and knock women back to the time when a man gets to choose how they dress and act. We're all living our own lives and get to decide these things for ourselves.

This is further compounded by the fact that there is a gross deficit of females in prominent roles in general.

That's a whole different societal issue that needs to be worked on. Also, we need to get past that point where when it happens people act cheekily about it instead of treating it as normal as they do for males in prominent roles. Blowing the whistle about it undoes much of the good of its existence, because it still stamps in people's brains that it is abnormal.